SEATTLE - A company does not owe a duty as a landowner and employer to an asbestos-exposed spouse who developed mesothelioma but did have a duty to protect her from foreseeable injury caused by its unsafe operation of its plant, a Washington court held Aug. 13 (Adeline Rochon and Lawrence Rochon v. Saberhagen Holdings Inc., et al., No. 58579-7-I, Wash. App., Div. 1).Full story on lexis.com : http://www.mealeysonline.com/mealey/ppv/articleSearch.do?searchTerm=%22%2022-14 Mealeys Litig. Rep. Asb. 2%20(2007)%20%22&pageLimit=10&pageNumber=0&publication=All+Mealey+Publications%3BMEALEY%3BMEALEY&relativeDateValue=NONE&fromDate=&toDate=&loc=mealeysrss